Advanced Machine Learning Techniques for Predictive Maintenance in Industrial IoT: Integrating Generative AI and Deep Learning for Real-Time Monitoring
Published 10-02-2021
Keywords
- Industrial IoT (IIoT),
- Predictive Maintenance (PdM,
- Generative AI (G-AI)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Abstract
The burgeoning growth of Industrial IoT (IIoT) has underscored the critical need for sophisticated predictive maintenance (PdM) strategies to guarantee optimal industrial performance. This paper investigates the synergistic integration of advanced machine learning (ML) techniques, specifically generative AI (G-AI) and deep learning (DL), for real-time anomaly detection and failure prediction within the IIoT landscape.
Traditional PdM approaches, heavily reliant on scheduled maintenance routines or rudimentary condition monitoring techniques, often prove inadequate in the face of increasingly complex industrial systems. The sheer volume and intricate nature of data generated by IIoT sensors necessitate more intelligent and data-driven solutions. In this context, G-AI emerges as a transformative tool, capable of synthesizing realistic sensor data to augment training datasets for DL models. This is particularly advantageous in scenarios where real-world data is scarce or proprietary, hindering the development of robust failure prediction models. By incorporating G-AI-generated data, DL models are exposed to a broader spectrum of potential anomalies, fostering the cultivation of more comprehensive and generalizable failure signatures. This, in turn, enhances the efficacy of anomaly detection algorithms, enabling them to discern even the most subtle deviations from normal operating conditions.
The paper delves further into the application of sophisticated DL architectures, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and recurrent neural networks (RNNs), for the purpose of extracting pertinent features and recognizing intricate patterns from continuous streams of sensor data. CNNs, with their inherent proficiency in image recognition, excel at capturing spatial relationships within sensor data, effectively identifying anomalies that manifest as abrupt changes in sensor readings or deviations from established patterns. RNNs, on the other hand, are adept at processing sequential data, making them ideally suited for analyzing temporal dependencies within sensor data streams. By combining the strengths of CNNs and RNNs, a comprehensive understanding of the underlying dynamics of sensor data can be achieved. This coalescence of G-AI and DL techniques fosters the identification of even the most subtle deviations from normal operating conditions, empowering proactive maintenance interventions. Consequently, the likelihood of catastrophic equipment failures is mitigated, ensuring operational continuity and optimizing industrial efficiency.
Downloads
References
- Z. Yu, L. Guo, and X. Li, "Convolutional neural networks for short-term traffic flow prediction," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 537, pp. 1083-1092, 2019.
- Y. Lei, N. Li, L. Xiang, S. S. Nair, and Y. Su, "Applications of machine learning to machine failure prediction: A review," arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.04399, 2018.
- M. E. Fayad, M. A. Mustafa, and N. H. Aishah, "Survey on machine learning based anomaly detection techniques for the internet of things," Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 150, p. 102471, 2020.
- Tatineni, Sumanth. "Ethical Considerations in AI and Data Science: Bias, Fairness, and Accountability." International Journal of Information Technology and Management Information Systems (IJITMIS) 10.1 (2019): 11-21.
- R. Yan, R. X. Gao, X. Li, and D. Zhang, "A survey on cyber-physical systems," IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 10-38, 2014.
- M. Chen, U. Challupalli, and D. L. Jones, "Proactive maintenance for intelligent manufacturing systems—with machine learning applications," Journal of Manufacturing Systems Engineering, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 265-285, 2019.
- I. J. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, "Generative adversarial networks," arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.2661, 2014.
- T. Salimans, I. J. Goodfellow, W. Zaremba, M. Mirza, L. Xu, X. Chen, and J. Rolfe, "Improved techniques for training gans," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2234-2242, 2016.
- M. Mirza and S. Osindero, "Conditional generative adversarial nets," arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1762, 2014.
- X. Mao, Q. Li, H. Li, L. Jia, and S. J. Tang, "Least squares generative adversarial networks," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 2794-2802, 2017.
- M. Mirza, S. Mehdi, L. Xu, J. F. Santos, and L. Xiao, "Stackgan: Improved image generation with stacked generative adversarial networks," in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 2218-2226, 2016.
- V. Chandola, A. Banerjee, and V. Kumar, "Anomaly detection: A survey," ACM computing surveys (CSUR), vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 1-58, 2009.
- L. Pang, Y. Jin, L. Wang, Y. Sun, and S. X. Mao, "A survey of anomaly detection techniques in big data," Knowledge and Information Systems, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 703-754, 2018.
- P. Malhotra, L. Vig, J. Han, and S. Sharma, "Long short-term memory networks for anomaly detection in time series data," arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.05238, 2015.
- Y. Zhou and Y. Guo, "Deep learning for anomaly detection: A survey," Neurocomputing, vol. 418, pp. 128-147, 2021.
- J. Anjum and S. Verma, "Deep learning for anomaly detection: A survey," arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.11403, 2020.
- K. J. Kim, C. D. Park, J. Kim, M. S. Kang, and E. S. Choi, "Data augmentation for deep learning in image classification," Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 113