Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery
Articles

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Verification: A Multi-Faceted Case Study Analysis of Best Practices and Challenges in Implementing AI-driven Zero Trust Security Models

Leeladhar Gudala
Associate Architect, Virtusa, New York, USA
Mahammad Shaik
Technical Lead - Software Application Development, Charles Schwab, Austin, Texas, USA
Cover

Published 13-12-2023

Keywords

  • Zero Trust Security,
  • Artificial Intelligence,
  • Cybersecurity,
  • Case Studies,
  • Best Practices

How to Cite

[1]
Leeladhar Gudala and Mahammad Shaik, “Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Verification: A Multi-Faceted Case Study Analysis of Best Practices and Challenges in Implementing AI-driven Zero Trust Security Models”, Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 62–84, Dec. 2023, Accessed: Nov. 24, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://scienceacadpress.com/index.php/jaasd/article/view/23

Abstract

The contemporary cybersecurity landscape presents a continuously evolving threat vector, rendering traditional perimeter-based security models increasingly inadequate. Zero Trust security models, built upon the principle of "never trust, always verify," have emerged as a robust defense mechanism against sophisticated cyberattacks. However, the ever-growing volume of data enterprises generate and the dynamic nature of cyber threats necessitate advanced analytical capabilities to effectively enforce Zero Trust principles. This research paper delves into the synergistic integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) within Zero Trust architectures. By meticulously analyzing case studies from organizations that have successfully implemented AI-enhanced Zero Trust security models, the research identifies not only best practices but also the inherent challenges associated with such implementations.

The paper explores key areas where AI empowers Zero Trust. One critical capability is AI-powered anomaly detection within network traffic. By continuously analyzing network activity for deviations from established baselines, AI can identify subtle indicators of malicious activity that might evade traditional signature-based detection methods. This enables organizations to proactively thwart cyberattacks before they can gain a foothold within the network.

Another area where AI bolsters Zero Trust security is through user and entity behavior analysis (UEBA). UEBA leverages machine learning algorithms to establish baselines for user and device behavior across the network. AI can then continuously monitor activity for anomalies that deviate from these baselines, potentially signifying unauthorized access attempts, insider threats, or compromised devices. This enables security teams to prioritize investigation efforts and swiftly respond to potential breaches.

Furthermore, AI can significantly enhance incident response capabilities within Zero Trust frameworks. By automating tasks such as threat investigation, containment, and remediation, AI-powered security solutions can expedite the response process, minimizing the potential damage from a security incident. This allows organizations to regain control of their IT infrastructure more rapidly and limit the impact of cyberattacks.

However, the integration of AI within Zero Trust frameworks also presents inherent challenges. One concern is the potential for bias within training data sets used to train AI models. Biased data can lead to skewed AI decision-making, potentially resulting in false positives or overlooking genuine threats. To mitigate this risk, organizations must ensure the quality and comprehensiveness of their training data.

Another challenge is the critical need for explainability in AI-driven security decisions. Traditional security solutions often generate clear audit trails that explain the rationale behind security actions. However, the complex nature of AI models can make their decision-making processes opaque. This lack of explainability can hinder trust and confidence in AI-powered security solutions. To address this challenge, organizations should prioritize deploying AI models that offer a degree of explainability, allowing security teams to understand the reasoning behind AI-generated alerts and recommendations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Atighet, R. M., & Zhang, X. (2020). Decoding the Zero Trust Framework: AI's Impact on Data Awareness. https://www.bankinfosecurity.com/ibm-nvidia-others-commit-to-develop-trustworthy-ai-a-23059
  2. Balachandran, M., & Elahi, P. (2020, September). The Future of Zero Trust with AI: Exploring How AI Automates and Enhances Security. In 2020 17th International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM) (pp. 147-156). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel7/2/9714075/09714079.pdf
  3. Barber, W., Garfinkel, T., Hernandez, D. A., Kampen, A., & Srivastava, V. (2016, August). Deny by default: A practical guide to deploying zero trust security. In 2016 10th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES) (pp. 261-270). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10092922
  4. Biggio, B., Sagliocca, F., Lee, C., Lipton, Z., Tramèr, F., & Xu, W. (2018). Fairness in machine learning: A survey of the problem and the state of the art. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 51(5), 1-38. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3616865
  5. Bolger, D., & Brutch, R. (2018, December). A Survey of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). In 2018 International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) (pp. 849-858). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8400040
  6. Chen, M., Mao, S., & Liu, Y. (2019, August). Big data: A survey. In 2019 International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigDataSmart) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9935459
  7. Dang, H. Q., Peng, Y., Qin, Z., & Ni, J. (2020, December). A survey on anomaly detection for cyber security. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (CSE) (pp. 1477-1482). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10170192
  8. Ghaemi, R., Rudra, A., & Noble, A. (2020). Bias in machine learning algorithms. Communications of the ACM, 63(11), 102-114. https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3278156
  9. Gupta, D. (2021, February 10). Enhancing Zero Trust Security with AI. https://cloudsecurityalliance.org/blog/2023/08/24/zero-trust-and-ai-better-together
  10. Haider, M. F., Zhao, X., Wang, H., & Sun, Y. (2020, October). A survey of graph anomaly detection techniques. In 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10143711
  11. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning with applications in R. Springer.
  12. Jhawar, S. S., Gupta, B., & Jain, S. (2020, July). A survey on explainable artificial intelligence for cyber security. In 2020 International Conference on Computing, Communication, and Security (ICCECS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10143992
  13. Joshi, I., & Kumar, A. (2019). Explainable AI for cybersecurity: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.041