Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery
Articles

Innovative Patient - Centered Dialysis Care Models: Boosting Engagement and Treatment Success

Asha Gadhiraju
Senior Solution Specialist, Deloitte Consulting LLP, Gilbert, Arizona, USA
Cover

Published 13-08-2023

Keywords

  • chronic kidney disease,
  • dialysis

How to Cite

[1]
Asha Gadhiraju, “Innovative Patient - Centered Dialysis Care Models: Boosting Engagement and Treatment Success”, Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–40, Aug. 2023, Accessed: Nov. 14, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://scienceacadpress.com/index.php/jaasd/article/view/200

Abstract

The escalating prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has led to an increased reliance on dialysis as a life-sustaining therapy, underscoring the need for innovations in patient care models. Traditional dialysis care often adopts a mechanistic approach, focusing predominantly on the technical aspects of treatment, while patient engagement, psychosocial well-being, and individualized care frequently remain secondary. This research aims to examine innovative patient-centered care models in dialysis that prioritize engagement, personalization, and collaboration between patients and healthcare providers to foster optimal health outcomes. A patient-centered approach to dialysis emphasizes personalized care plans that consider individual patient needs, preferences, and life circumstances, seeking to enhance treatment adherence and overall quality of life. Key components of such models include shared decision-making, education, behavioral and psychological support, and technological solutions that enable continuous patient-provider interactions. For example, shared decision-making empowers patients to actively participate in their care planning, potentially increasing their motivation to adhere to prescribed treatments. Comprehensive educational interventions, addressing both the physiological aspects of dialysis and lifestyle management, are also integral to patient-centered dialysis care models. They not only demystify the treatment process but also help patients develop a proactive attitude toward self-management.

Furthermore, psychological support through counseling and mental health resources addresses the high incidence of depression and anxiety in dialysis patients, conditions that often hinder adherence to treatment protocols and negatively impact patient outcomes. This paper examines these psychosocial factors within patient-centered models, with a focus on improving mental health support as a core element of dialysis care. Additionally, technological advancements, such as telemedicine and wearable monitoring devices, are facilitating the adoption of patient-centered care by enabling patients to monitor their health data in real time and maintain a continuous line of communication with their healthcare teams. The advent of digital platforms has enhanced patient engagement and allowed for more dynamic and responsive care, accommodating individual patient needs outside traditional clinical settings. This paper also investigates innovative dialysis models such as home hemodialysis (HHD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD), which offer patients greater autonomy, flexibility, and control over their treatment schedules. These home-based models have been associated with increased patient satisfaction, improved quality of life, and, in many cases, better clinical outcomes compared to in-center dialysis.

The efficacy of patient-centered care models is evaluated through a comprehensive review of recent clinical studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. This analysis highlights the positive correlation between patient engagement strategies and improved clinical metrics, including reduced hospitalization rates, better fluid balance control, and enhanced patient-reported outcomes. Emphasis is placed on models that integrate multidisciplinary care teams—comprising nephrologists, nurses, dietitians, social workers, and mental health professionals—as they play a crucial role in providing comprehensive support that aligns with patient-centered principles. Additionally, this paper addresses potential challenges in implementing patient-centered models, such as resource allocation, training of healthcare staff, and patient variability in terms of digital literacy and access to technology. By exploring these barriers, we identify strategies for overcoming them, including policy adjustments and funding reallocation toward patient-centered innovations in dialysis care.

In conclusion, innovative patient-centered dialysis care models represent a transformative approach to chronic kidney disease management, aiming to elevate patient autonomy, improve adherence, and achieve better health outcomes. This research advocates for the widespread adoption of these models, which not only support the physiological needs of dialysis patients but also address the psychological, social, and lifestyle factors essential for holistic care. The insights gained through this study are intended to inform healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers about the benefits and feasibility of implementing patient-centered care models in dialysis settings, ultimately aiming to shift dialysis treatment from a provider-centered to a truly patient-centered paradigm.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. L. e Silva, S. J. Alves, and R. M. Tavares, “Patient-centered care in dialysis: A systematic review,” Journal of Nephrology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 107-119, 2020.
  2. K. e Silva, F. C. de Azevedo, and J. M. do Nascimento, “Home hemodialysis: A patient-centered approach,” Kidney International Supplements, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 21-27, 2020.
  3. K. Cheung, T. P. McMillan, and R. M. Cohen, “Innovative models of care in chronic kidney disease,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 733-739, 2020.
  4. N. e Hsu, “Patient-centered dialysis care: Engaging patients in decision making,” Nephrology Nursing Journal, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 31-41, 2020.
  5. T. A. Schreiber, and M. C. K. Chew, “Telehealth and its role in chronic kidney disease management,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 748-755, 2021.
  6. Gondal, M. N., Butt, R. N., Shah, O. S., Sultan, M. U., Mustafa, G., Nasir, Z., ... & Chaudhary, S. U. (2021). A personalized therapeutics approach using an in silico drosophila patient model reveals optimal chemo-and targeted therapy combinations for colorectal cancer. Frontiers in Oncology, 11, 692592.
  7. Khurshid, Ghazal, et al. "A cyanobacterial photorespiratory bypass model to enhance photosynthesis by rerouting photorespiratory pathway in C3 plants." Scientific Reports 10.1 (2020): 20879.
  8. B. S. Grubbs and M. A. McClellan, “Quality of life and patient-centered outcomes in dialysis patients,” Journal of American Society of Nephrology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 586-595, 2020.
  9. F. Chow, “The impact of patient education on treatment adherence in dialysis,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 567-575, 2020.
  10. L. H. Schmidt, “Comparative effectiveness of home dialysis versus in-center dialysis,” Kidney International, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 894-905, 2021.
  11. R. Akbari, “Patient-centered outcomes research in chronic kidney disease,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 20-28, 2020.
  12. S. Joshi, “Engagement strategies for dialysis patients: A systematic review,” BMC Nephrology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 111-123, 2021.
  13. H. A. Versteeg, and W. H. van der Boog, “Barriers to patient-centered care in kidney disease management,” Clinical Nephrology, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 285-293, 2021.
  14. W. Chang, “Decision-making in dialysis: Involving patients in care plans,” Journal of Nephrology, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 987-996, 2021.
  15. L. Meyer, “The role of psychological support in chronic kidney disease management,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 347-356, 2020.
  16. D. W. van der Boog, “Multidisciplinary approaches to kidney disease care: A review,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1345-1354, 2021.
  17. K. F. Whittle, “Advances in telemedicine for chronic kidney disease: A review,” Kidney International Reports, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 289-298, 2021.
  18. Y. Kim, “Assessing the effectiveness of home dialysis programs,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 611-620, 2021.
  19. W. Lee, “Patient engagement and empowerment in chronic disease management,” Health Policy and Technology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 101-110, 2021.
  20. Y. Chen, “Quality of care in home hemodialysis: Patient-centered considerations,” Nephrology Nursing Journal, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 120-130, 2021.
  21. E. N. Smith, “Addressing social determinants of health in dialysis care,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 741-750, 2020.
  22. T. Yang, “Integrating patient feedback into dialysis care,” Journal of Nephrology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 87-95, 2021.