Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery
Articles

Leveraging Generative AI for Personalized Medicine: Applications in Drug Discovery and Development

Kummaragunta Joel Prabhod
Senior Artificial Intelligence Engineer, Stanford Health Care, United States of America
Cover

Published 19-04-2023

Keywords

  • Generative AI,
  • personalized medicine,
  • drug discovery,
  • drug development,
  • generative adversarial networks,
  • variational autoencoders,
  • reinforcement learning
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

[1]
K. Joel Prabhod, “Leveraging Generative AI for Personalized Medicine: Applications in Drug Discovery and Development”, Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 392–434, Apr. 2023, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://scienceacadpress.com/index.php/jaasd/article/view/133

Abstract

The advent of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has catalyzed significant advancements in various domains, including personalized medicine. This paper explores the transformative potential of generative AI technologies in the realm of drug discovery and development. The study meticulously examines how generative models, specifically those leveraging deep learning algorithms, can revolutionize personalized medicine by enhancing the precision and efficiency of drug design and formulation.

Generative AI encompasses a range of methodologies, including generative adversarial networks (GANs), variational autoencoders (VAEs), and reinforcement learning models. These technologies are pivotal in predicting novel molecular structures, optimizing drug candidates, and expediting the overall development process. By employing these models, researchers can generate plausible chemical compounds and simulate their interactions with biological targets, thereby identifying promising drug candidates with unprecedented speed and accuracy.

In drug discovery, generative AI techniques facilitate the de novo design of molecular structures that adhere to desired pharmacological profiles. GANs, for instance, are adept at creating new molecular entities by learning from existing chemical databases, thus providing a broad spectrum of potential candidates for further evaluation. Similarly, VAEs enable the generation of diverse molecular libraries, enhancing the likelihood of discovering effective therapeutics tailored to individual patient profiles.

The optimization of drug formulations is another critical application of generative AI. Reinforcement learning algorithms are utilized to fine-tune drug properties, such as solubility, stability, and bioavailability, through iterative simulations and adjustments. This iterative process not only accelerates the optimization phase but also ensures that the resultant formulations are more aligned with personalized treatment needs.

Moreover, generative AI can substantially reduce the time and cost associated with traditional drug development pipelines. By streamlining various stages of the process, from hit identification to lead optimization, these models mitigate the risks of late-stage failures and enhance the efficiency of clinical trials. This reduction in developmental bottlenecks is instrumental in bringing novel therapeutics to market more rapidly and cost-effectively.

The integration of generative AI into personalized medicine also poses several challenges and considerations. Data quality and availability, model interpretability, and ethical implications of AI-driven decision-making are critical factors that must be addressed to fully leverage these technologies. Ensuring the robustness and generalizability of generative models is essential for their successful application in diverse patient populations and therapeutic contexts.

In conclusion, the application of generative AI in personalized medicine holds substantial promise for advancing drug discovery and development. By harnessing the capabilities of these sophisticated models, researchers and clinicians can achieve more effective and individualized treatments, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the current state of generative AI technologies in this field, highlighting their potential benefits, challenges, and future directions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. [1] I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, “Generative adversarial nets,” in Proc. Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2014, pp. 2672–2680.
  2. [2] Chen, Jan-Jo, Ali Husnain, and Wei-Wei Cheng. "Exploring the Trade-Off Between Performance and Cost in Facial Recognition: Deep Learning Versus Traditional Computer Vision." Proceedings of SAI Intelligent Systems Conference. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023.
  3. [3] Gondal, Mahnoor Naseer, and Safee Ullah Chaudhary. "Navigating multi-scale cancer systems biology towards model-driven clinical oncology and its applications in personalized therapeutics." Frontiers in Oncology 11 (2021): 712505.
  4. [4] R. K. Gupta, A. D. Kesselheim, and D. M. C. Seager, “Personalized medicine: Current status and future perspectives,” Journal of Personalized Medicine, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 256–265, 2020.
  5. [5] R. H. G. J. P. C. D. M. W. K. A. S. H. H. F. R. and M. F. K., “Deep generative models for molecular design: A review,” Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, vol. 19, pp. 2171–2185, 2021.
  6. [6] K. T. A. L. L. H. J. B. and B. G., “Reinforcement learning for optimizing drug formulations,” Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 3, pp. 123–131, 2021.
  7. [7] B. T. B. S. W. A. J. F. J. R. and L. B., “Generative models for drug discovery: A comparative study of GANs and VAEs,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 2527–2538, 2021.
  8. [8] J. Lee, J. Xie, and L. F. D. G. J. H., “Variational autoencoders for drug discovery: Current advances and future prospects,” Bioinformatics, vol. 37, no. 22, pp. 3619–3627, 2021.
  9. [9] A. D. R. S. M. B. and H. S., “Drug discovery with machine learning: A review of recent advancements,” Drug Discovery Today, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1084–1092, 2021.
  10. [10] E. J. G. M. F. A. L. B. and P. P., “Leveraging generative AI for accelerating clinical trials: A review,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 456–463, 2022.
  11. [11] K. E. M. C. M. L. K. and W. M., “Ethical considerations in AI-driven drug discovery: Balancing innovation with responsibility,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 22, pp. 191–200, 2022.
  12. [12] J. Y. H. S. C. J. M. W. and A. R., “Generative adversarial networks for chemical compound generation: A comprehensive survey,” Molecular Informatics, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 209–223, 2021.
  13. [13] C. G. D. F. C. and K. A., “Advancements in computational tools for drug discovery,” Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2021.
  14. [14] A. B. T. T. K. R. B. and L. H., “AI-driven optimization in pharmaceutical formulations: Current trends and future directions,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 1455–1467, 2021.
  15. [15] H. S. S. S. C. M. W. and J. B., “The role of reinforcement learning in pharmaceutical development,” Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, vol. 61, pp. 101567, 2021.
  16. [16] L. B. M. S. A. K. and J. F., “Interdisciplinary approaches in generative AI for drug discovery,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 472–484, 2021.
  17. [17] T. C. S. D. S. K. and C. L., “Challenges and limitations of generative AI in drug discovery,” Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol. 120, pp. 102250, 2021.
  18. [18] N. M. K. R. L. J. and R. W., “Improving drug discovery efficiency through AI integration: A case study,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 224, pp. 107788, 2021.
  19. [19] Z. X. S. T. M. F. and L. W., “Future prospects of generative AI in personalized medicine,” Bioengineering & Translational Medicine, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. e10224, 2022.
  20. [20] M. A. B. P. N. C. and T. G., “Regulatory and ethical considerations in the deployment of AI in personalized medicine,” Regulatory Affairs Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 131–140, 2022.