Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery
Articles

Forging Interdisciplinary Pathways: A Comprehensive Exploration of Cross-Disciplinary Approaches to Bolstering Artificial Intelligence Robustness and Reliability

Rajiv Avacharmal
AI/ML Risk Lead, Independent Researcher, USA
Ashok Kumar Reddy Sadhu
Software Engineer, Deloitte, Dallas, Texas
Sai Ganesh Reddy Bojja
Independent Researcher, Austin, Texas, USA
Cover

Published 16-08-2023

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence (AI),
  • Robustness,
  • Reliability,
  • Cross-disciplinary approaches,
  • Formal verification,
  • Adversarial examples,
  • Control theory,
  • Bias detection,
  • Human-AI collaboration
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

[1]
R. Avacharmal, A. Kumar Reddy Sadhu, and S. Ganesh Reddy Bojja, “Forging Interdisciplinary Pathways: A Comprehensive Exploration of Cross-Disciplinary Approaches to Bolstering Artificial Intelligence Robustness and Reliability”, Journal of AI-Assisted Scientific Discovery, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 364–370, Aug. 2023, Accessed: Sep. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://scienceacadpress.com/index.php/jaasd/article/view/109

Abstract

The burgeoning field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has witnessed remarkable advancements, revolutionizing numerous facets of human life. However, ensuring the robustness and reliability of AI systems remains a paramount challenge. These systems are often susceptible to adversarial attacks, data biases, and environmental perturbations, potentially leading to catastrophic consequences. To address these vulnerabilities, this paper advocates for a paradigm shift, emphasizing the crucial role of cross-disciplinary approaches in fortifying AI.

This work delves into the limitations of current, predominantly monodisciplinary AI development practices. While each field offers valuable insights, a siloed approach hinders the creation of truly robust and reliable systems. We posit that by fostering collaboration between diverse disciplines, such as computer science, mathematics, psychology, cognitive science, and control theory, we can unlock a new era of resilient AI.

Synergistic Fusion of Computer Science and Mathematics:

At the core of AI lies computer science, particularly machine learning (ML) with its powerful algorithms. However, ML models are often susceptible to adversarial examples – meticulously crafted inputs that cause the model to produce erroneous outputs. Here, mathematics comes to the fore. Formal verification techniques, rooted in logic and set theory, can be leveraged to mathematically prove the correctness of AI models under specific conditions. This synergy between computer science and mathematics paves the way for the development of provably robust AI systems.

Incorporating Insights from Psychology and Cognitive Science:

The human mind exhibits a remarkable degree of robustness in its decision-making processes. Psychology and cognitive science offer invaluable insights into how humans handle uncertainty, reason under pressure, and adapt to changing environments. By incorporating these principles into AI design, we can create systems that are more resilient to unexpected scenarios and capable of learning from experience. For instance, research in bounded rationality, where humans make optimal decisions under limited information, can inform the development of AI systems that can function effectively in situations with incomplete data.

The Role of Control Theory in Bolstering Reliability:

Control theory, a branch of engineering concerned with the behavior of dynamic systems, offers a potent framework for ensuring the reliability of AI systems. By applying control theory principles, we can design AI systems that are inherently stable and can gracefully handle unexpected disturbances. This is particularly crucial for safety-critical applications, such as autonomous vehicles, where even minor deviations can have catastrophic consequences.

Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration for Bias Detection and Mitigation:

AI systems are often susceptible to biases inherent in the data they are trained on. These biases can lead to discriminatory outcomes, undermining the fairness and trustworthiness of AI. Here, the fields of sociology and ethics can contribute significantly. By employing techniques from these disciplines, such as fairness metrics and bias detection algorithms, we can identify and mitigate biases within AI systems. Additionally, psychologists can offer valuable insights into human perception of fairness, informing the design of AI systems that align with human ethical principles.

The Imperative for Human-AI Collaboration:

While cross-disciplinary approaches hold immense promise, human oversight remains indispensable. To ensure the responsible development and deployment of AI, it is crucial to foster effective human-AI collaboration. By leveraging human expertise in areas like judgment, creativity, and ethical decision-making, we can guide AI systems towards achieving optimal outcomes that align with human values.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Amodei, Dario, et al. "Concrete problems in AI safety." arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565 (2016).
  2. Barash, Victor, and Yuval Ben-Itzhak. "Attacks and defenses against adversarial examples within the real-world context of deep learning." In International Conference on Detection of Intrusions and Malware, and Vulnerability Assessment (DIMVA), pp. 204-221. Springer, Cham, 2019.
  3. Bodík, Richard, et al. "Why is my classifier biased? A guide to understanding and addressing algorithmic bias." Communications of the ACM 63.5 (2020): 54-64.
  4. Bryson, Joanna J. "The ethics of artificial intelligence." Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1004.1 (2003): 17-36.
  5. Dennett, Daniel C. From bacteria to Bach: And back again. W. W. Norton & Company, 2017.
  6. Drexler, Eric. "Critical uncertainties in advanced artificial intelligence." In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-95), Vol. 1, pp. 1063-1070. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1995.
  7. Etzioni, Oren, and Oren Etzioni. "An introduction to symbolic learning." Artificial intelligence 131 (2001): 5-31.
  8. Goodfellow, Ian J., et al. "Explaining and manipulating representations of neural networks." arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6072 (2014).
  9. Goodman, Noah, and Joshua Tenenbaum. "Learning probabilistic causality." Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10.7 (2006): 305-311.
  10. Habermeier, Kevin, et al. "Reliable AI for the real world." arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.08322 (2019).
  11. Hart, David M., et al. "Differential game control." IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 8.5 (1963): 308-315.
  12. Holzmann, Gerard J. "The science of security." Addison-Wesley Professional, 2008.
  13. Howard, Stuart J., and Jeff Hawkins. "Subcellular mechanisms of learning and memory in neocortex." Current Opinion in Neurobiology 13.6 (2003): 744-752.
  14. Hutson, Matthew. "Artificial intelligence ethics: A literature review." Journal of Artificial Intelligence Ethics (2020): 1-21.
  15. Johnson, David E. "Logical foundations of state space theory." In Proceedings of the 1971 ACM SIGPLAN conference on Programming languages, pp. 88-97. 1971.
  16. Jonsson, Henrik K. "A brief history of formal verification." In Essays in Logic and Philosophy, pp. 167-189. Springer, Dordrecht, 2001.
  17. Kaplan, Michael, and Michael Montague. "Perhaps in logic." Journal of Philosophical Logic 15.2 (1986): 153-178.
  18. Khan, Salman, et al. "Formal verification of deep networks for safety-critical applications." In 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD), pp. 1-8. IEEE, 2018.
  19. Levesque, Hector J. "Making believers out of computers." Artificial intelligence 30.2 (1986): 183-210.
  20. Lin, Huey-Wen, et al. "Interpretable decision-making for natural language processing with lime." arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.08252 (2016).
  21. Litman, David J., and Manuela Veloso. "Robotics." Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  22. Loh, Kean-Ming, et al. "Interpretable machine learning for log anomaly detection." In 2017 ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1093-1102. ACM, 2017.
  23. Miller, Timothy P. "Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social and cognitive sciences." Artificial intelligence 267 (2019)